
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Red light cameras back in Chandler	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://wn.calicoeng.com/2017/05/11/red-light-cameras-back-chandler/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://wn.calicoeng.com/2017/05/11/red-light-cameras-back-chandler/</link>
	<description>Tempe &#38; West Chandler The Place We Call Home</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2017 22:28:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Scott Ottersen		</title>
		<link>https://wn.calicoeng.com/2017/05/11/red-light-cameras-back-chandler/#comment-49522</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Ottersen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2017 22:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wranglernews.com/?p=14211#comment-49522</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I thought there was a billed passed last year that bans traffic scameras on State Highways? This caused the removal of scameras on Grand Ave in El Mirage speed traps and on SR87 in Star Valley east of Payson on their revenue raisers.
Why does Chandler still have scameras on Az Ave at Warner, Ray, and Ocotillo Roads? Az Ave is also SR87!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought there was a billed passed last year that bans traffic scameras on State Highways? This caused the removal of scameras on Grand Ave in El Mirage speed traps and on SR87 in Star Valley east of Payson on their revenue raisers.<br />
Why does Chandler still have scameras on Az Ave at Warner, Ray, and Ocotillo Roads? Az Ave is also SR87!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: James Walker		</title>
		<link>https://wn.calicoeng.com/2017/05/11/red-light-cameras-back-chandler/#comment-48236</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Walker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2017 03:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wranglernews.com/?p=14211#comment-48236</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Chandler, like some other cities, is determined to profit from mostly safe drivers by using speed cameras where the posted limits are set at least 10 mph lower than the safest levels and by using red light cameras where the yellow intervals are set about one second too short for the actual conditions.  This makes the cameras very profitable, but makes them government-run for-profit rackets to enforce for profits.  But enforcement for profits is 100% wrong 100% of the time.

If governments were not the business partners of the for-profit camera companies, these scams could be investigated under RICO statutes for racketeering.

James C. Walker, National Motorists Association]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chandler, like some other cities, is determined to profit from mostly safe drivers by using speed cameras where the posted limits are set at least 10 mph lower than the safest levels and by using red light cameras where the yellow intervals are set about one second too short for the actual conditions.  This makes the cameras very profitable, but makes them government-run for-profit rackets to enforce for profits.  But enforcement for profits is 100% wrong 100% of the time.</p>
<p>If governments were not the business partners of the for-profit camera companies, these scams could be investigated under RICO statutes for racketeering.</p>
<p>James C. Walker, National Motorists Association</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
